Jump to content

Talk:A Little More Personal (Raw)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleA Little More Personal (Raw) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 22, 2012Good article nomineeListed

Album name

[edit]

The album's name will be A LITTLE MORE PERSONAL (RAW) (official music site). an odd name 19:58, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merging from the single articles

[edit]

To quote user:FuriousFreddy: if a song article is nothing but a recounting of how the song was made, and how well it did, without explaining that it was, in some way, important and influential to the music industry, there's really no reason for it. Just write good album articles, and selected articles on the important singles and album tracks, and let's keep the encyclopedia balanced. Encyclopedias aren't supposed to be "complete"; they are supposed to provide overviews and guide users to further information on a subject if they want to go beyond the standard level. Something like a Lindsay Lohan fan wiki would be a fine place to have an article on every Lohan song, but a general-purpose encyclopedia is not. See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Pop music issues and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music/Notability and Music Guidelines/Songs. Why write dozens of short articles on singles, with no chances of actual expansion short of padding and marketing-report material (chart positions), when they can be combined into one album article? Extraordinary Machine 00:03, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

the song is a notable song by a notable artist and has charted in many charts, like kelly clarkson, mariah carey, britney spears so why dont you let the article be? if you do this to lindsay lohan then why not theirs?

I absolutely agree on that--hottie 13:51, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Lillygirl 07:06, 20 May 2006

Gold certification?

[edit]

Can anyone supply a citation for this reference? The 500,000 sales figure itself is dubious (I can find no reputable source) and the RIAA website does not list any certification. Absent a trusted source, I intend to remove this reference per WP:CITE. RadioKirk talk to me 04:40, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, found the source. On the other hand, there still is no reputable source for the assertion that "Fastlane" is the next single; it seems to have started at ContactMusic, which is often quite wrong. RadioKirk talk to me 17:31, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Worldwide Sales

[edit]

Does anyone know what this has sold worldwide... roughly?

In "Lindsay Lohan chronology" in the infobox, the next (future) spot, the reference to an undetermined future release should be deleted. Ward3001 (talk) 16:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:A Little More Personal (Raw)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 01:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:


Infobox

[edit]
  • Information is needed in the article to support that the genre of the album is pop rock

Lead

[edit]
  • ...including at MTV's Total Request Live, The Ellen DeGeneres Show and the American Music Awards of 2005. Change "American Music Awards of 2005" to "2005 American Music Awards" to make prose flow better

Background and recording

[edit]
  • ...for which he was charged with driving under the influence of alcohool.[4] Fix spelling issue

Reception

[edit]
  • "A Little More Personal (Raw)" debuted at number twenty on Billboard 200... Add "the" between "on" and "Billboard"
  • ...same position on Billboard Digital Albums, dropping the chart on the following.[13] Add "week" at the end of the sentence to clarify prose
  • As of May 2008, the album has sold additional 305,000 copies in the United States, and failed to chart in other countries.[16] Add "an" between "sold" and "additional"; Add "has" between "and" and "failed"

Promotion

[edit]
  • The tour, however, didn't happen for unknown reasons. Verifiable?
  • ...and her cover of "Edge of Seventeen" in the American Music Awards of 2005.[19] Change "American Music Awards of 2005" to "2005 American Music Awards"

Track listing

[edit]
  • Find a source to verify all of the information in this section

Credits and personnel

[edit]
  • No issues

Charts and certifications

[edit]
  • No issues

References

[edit]
  • References 1, 6, 19, 22 "MTV" should not be italicized; "Viacom" should be the publisher
  • Publisher fixed. Although, the {{cite web}} template writes MTV instead of MTV; so i can't fix it.
  • Reference 3 "IGN" should not be italicized
  • It's a {{cite web}} issue I can't fix, since IGN goes on "work", and the template italicizes work by default.
  • Reference 4 Same as issue for Reference 1; Publisher should not be wiki-linked as it was already in an earlier source
    • Done.
  • Reference 7 "Jann Wenner" should be wiki-linked as it is publisher of Rolling Stone magazine
  • Done
  • Reference 20 "About.com" should not be italicized
    • Explained above.
  • Reference 21 "iTunes Store" should not be italicized
    • Explained above.
  • Reference 23 Same issue as Reference 21; Both should not be wiki-linked as they were done so already in another reference
    • dewiki-linked all. The other issue explained above.
  • Reference 25 "Billboard" and "Prometheus Global Media" should not be wiki-linked
    • Done.


After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. There are some minor prose issues, citation questions, and reference formatting issues that are keeping this article from reaching good article status. I will give you the general seven days to address these issues and/or discuss points which you believe may not concern the good article criteria. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 02:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Think i've fixed all and explained what i can't fix. Thanks for the review. —Hahc21 01:59, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Since all of the issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 06:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Total sales states May, 2013

[edit]

but it isn't even May 2013--I assume it's a typo based on 2012. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.62.127.1 (talk) 16:37, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on A Little More Personal (Raw). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:13, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A Little More Personal (Raw). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]