Talk:A Happy Coercion
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 31 March 2021
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Non-controversial move (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 02:32, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
A Happy Coersion → A Happy Coercion – The IMDB page and corresponding Italian article spell it the proposed way; however, I am unfamiliar with the film and didn't want to be overly bold and make a change I couldn't wholly substantiate on my own. – Coreydragon (talk) 02:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nomination and per correct spelling (Coercion). Unless a poster or title credits can be produced as proof that this 1914 film deliberately misspelled the word in the manner of Inglourious Basterds, the title must be spelled correctly. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 07:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support per spelling. – DarkGlow • 19:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Stub-Class Comedy articles
- Unknown-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles
- Stub-Class film articles
- Stub-Class Silent films articles
- Silent films task force articles
- Silent films articles needing an image
- Stub-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- American cinema articles needing an image
- Film articles needing an image
- WikiProject Film articles