Talk:A Doctor's Report on Dianetics

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the A Doctor's Report on Dianetics article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from A Doctor's Report on Dianetics appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 May 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the non-fiction book A Doctor's Report on Dianetics criticized L. Ron Hubbard's prescription of vitamins and glutamic acid to Dianetics subjects?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/May.

Wikipedia

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Scientology Mid‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Started article

Started article, with (10) citations from reputable secondary sources. Now to find more citations and expand article. Could also use an image of the bookcover at some point... Smee 10:22, 2 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Neutrality

Winter was a disgruntled ex-partner of Hubbard. No way that this could be called a neutral 3rd-party opinion. --Justanother 11:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Winter may have been a disgruntled ex-partner, but that doesn't make the article non-neutral, it merely means this man's opinion may have been influenced. As long as his viewpoint is correctly shown here, the article is neutral. Madness 13:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. Smee 14:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:A Doctor's Report on Dianetics/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

*(10) citations, need a bookcover image. Smee 10:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Last edited at 10:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 06:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A Doctor's Report on Dianetics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928030618/http://www.anti-scientologie.ch/pdf-books/To_Be_Perfectly_Clear_-_Bainbridge_Stark.pdf to http://www.anti-scientologie.ch/pdf-books/To_Be_Perfectly_Clear_-_Bainbridge_Stark.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]