Talk:A Catholic Statement on Pluralism and Abortion/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grandiose (talk · contribs) 17:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC) I'll be doing a full review shortly, but the article looks very promising. I haev made a couple of small changes. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 17:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the layout to comply better with WP:LAYOUT and made one small change to the lead.
Better "Purpose of use" rationale needed on the lead image.
Currently stable. I would like to put on the record that the article does have an enflamed history, but warring ceased on 10 September 2011.
Neutral. Those edit war were mainly over the use of sources that would otherwise qualify as reliable sources but were involved in the document itself. In this regard I find no overall bias in the article, which is a clear indication that the discussion reached an appropriate comprimise.

If these changes are accepted, then I'm happy to pass the article. On hold for that and any other issues which come up. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 17:36, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The lead fails to make clear the difference between the "Maguire/Maguire/Kissling position paper holding about 80 signatures" and the advertisement. What it has to make clear is that the position and theory was then adapted into advertisement form, rather than this whole escapade being about the advertisement. Advertisement or no advertisement, there were other facets to the movement that lead to it. I wasn't particularly happy with my changes, but this should be put across somehow. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 19:02, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will take a look at the text and see if I can make it clear that the advertisement was crafted from an existing position paper. Binksternet (talk) 18:11, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added some text and adjusted the lead section to highlight the earlier position paper which led to the advertisement. I also went over to the image page and beefed up the stated purpose. Binksternet (talk) 23:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Much better - passing. I would encourage to review another nomination against the GA criteria. Points also mean prizes in the December 2011 Good Article Nominations Backlog Elimination Drive! Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 12:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]