Talk:A Cambridge Mass
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the A Cambridge Mass article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Necessary Improvements
[edit]This article as I have written it is a start. However if anyone as additional verifiable information to add, especially about the tempos for the remaining two movements, please feel free to do so.
Also the analysis needs to be beefed up, however I am not sufficiently skilled to do so. The references and external links contain various journalistic accounts, but I have not located any formal studies online.Graham1973 (talk) 15:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
'setting'
[edit]What is a 'setting'? A scene or movement? Is there a better way to say this?
From the first sentence: "the other being a setting of Swinburnes' The Garden of Proserpine" LaTeeDa (talk) 01:30, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- 'Setting' in this context refers to setting the words to music, if the setting is for two soloists (one voice, one instumental), then it is termed an Art Song, for larger settings a variety of terms can be used, cantata, motet or anthem.
- I've also taken the step of editing that sentance to make it clearer.Graham1973 (talk)
- That helps - thanks. LaTeeDa (talk) 10:59, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing out that what I had written was unclear and also for the fixes you have made to date. I'll keep them in mind when I start work on an article covering the Cantata RVW wrote based on the Swinburne poem.Graham1973 (talk) 13:06, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- No problem at all. By the way, maybe you know more about Swinburne than me. The biographical article, Algernon Charles Swinburne, is mostly unsourced, and looks from my perch like pure copy and paste from another source. I tried to find where this is copied from, but no luck. Any thoughts? LaTeeDa (talk) 02:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Sadly, no. But I have taken the step of adding a 'Multiple Issues' template to the article. Graham1973 (talk) 14:22, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- No problem at all. By the way, maybe you know more about Swinburne than me. The biographical article, Algernon Charles Swinburne, is mostly unsourced, and looks from my perch like pure copy and paste from another source. I tried to find where this is copied from, but no luck. Any thoughts? LaTeeDa (talk) 02:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing out that what I had written was unclear and also for the fixes you have made to date. I'll keep them in mind when I start work on an article covering the Cantata RVW wrote based on the Swinburne poem.Graham1973 (talk) 13:06, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on A Cambridge Mass. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006104820/http://albionrecords.org/notes/proserpine_notes/proserpine_notes.html to http://albionrecords.org/notes/proserpine_notes/proserpine_notes.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141008160437/http://albionrecords.org/notes/cambridge_notes/cambridge_notes.html to http://albionrecords.org/notes/cambridge_notes/cambridge_notes.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:28, 24 June 2017 (UTC)