Talk:A Burning

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Negative Reviews

I have (anonymously) added references to three gravely negative reviews of this novel, two of them being from newspapers of a common ownership. And have altered the words "postive reviews" to "mixed reviews" in the introductory paragraph. Please discuss here if wish to revert this change. Granta80 (talk) 19:48, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss here if *you wish to revert this change. Granta80 (talk) 19:51, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems OK to me but the issue that you edit has caused is that there are now seven sources following a simple statement. WP:OVERCITE OR WP:REFBOMBING might apply. The best thing would be to break out these articles into the existing Critical Reception section, with some explanatory text. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 20:00, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I just added a fourth one! I am reprhasing that sentence now, in order to split the references. Would expand the critical reception heading in a couple of days. Granta80 (talk) 20:44, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]