Talk:A Better World (album)

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 August 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Notability

Spl237, what was its chart position? If it is notable (WP:NALBUM or WP:GNG), then there is nothing in this article to confirm that. It is irrelevant that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Boleyn (talk) 15:22, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chart positions are as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_de_Burgh_discography - 60 in the UK, 7 in Germany, 17 in Sweden, 49 in Austria. I have included a reference to the UK charts with evidence of the first of these. As per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Albums, "The single or album has appeared on any country's national music chart" is evidence of a recording being notable - this album has appeared on charts in several European countries, including a top 10 placing in Germany.

As before - these are higher chart positions than achieved by the preceding album, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hands_of_Man - if this album is insufficiently notable to justify its own page, then that one is also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spl237 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spl237, s before, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't relevant. The issue here is that you have put an article in the mainspace which does not say why it is notable (doesn't give chart positions in the article for one) and doesn't have the sourcing to establish WP:GNG. If it was no 7 in Germany and no 17 in Sweden, that would meet WP:NALBUM. But it's not enough to just say it here, you need to say it in the article and you need to WP:VERIFY it. Boleyn (talk) 16:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]