Talk:A 29-Cent Robbery/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Good888 (talk · contribs) 09:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Going to take a look at this silent film article soon. good888 (talk) 09:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- Review is now complete. good888 (talk) 10:17, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Lead section
- State in the lead that this was Marie Eline's film debut.
Plot
- "She is so upset about the theft of her bank that he parents decide to inform the police." Her parents.
Release and reception
- "The Morning Telegraph said the story was too far-fetched to be believable, but it was done in an amusing way." Need a source here.
References
- Link the publishers of these sources if possible.
Images
- Since the film is not lost (at least I assume it isn't), is it possible you could add a film still?
Going to place on hold for now. good888 (talk) 10:17, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- Good888 All set. The best image I found was the advertisement which has a really terrible film still on it. This was actually the best of the versions that I had access to. One of the scans was from the Fulton database and it was just pitch-black. This one from the Billboard was another variant that was better preserved, but they may have come from the same source given the damage. I think this one came from the Archive.org scans. The database I use doesn't have any better versions to replace it with either.... and I've been proactive about this too. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- Right well since the issues have been addressed, I will promote to GA class. good888 (talk) 09:17, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- Good888 All set. The best image I found was the advertisement which has a really terrible film still on it. This was actually the best of the versions that I had access to. One of the scans was from the Fulton database and it was just pitch-black. This one from the Billboard was another variant that was better preserved, but they may have come from the same source given the damage. I think this one came from the Archive.org scans. The database I use doesn't have any better versions to replace it with either.... and I've been proactive about this too. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)