Talk:AVC-Intra

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Technical Details. Entropy Coding seems wrong.

The article says, that in Class50 only CABAC can be used. This seems to be wrong. The SMPTE Recommended Practice 2027-2007 only recommends to use CABAC for Class50 and CAVLC for Class100, see Annex B for details. RP actually does allow any of entropy coding for both classes, for example: "In addition, specific applications where higher complexity, such as high performance processing, justifies using CABAC to achieve higher picture quality, CABAC might be selected for the Class 100 specification.".

Alexcyn (talk) 10:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are right about SMPTE-RP. AVC-Intra could use CABAC for 100 class, but Panasonic chose not to do so. This info used to be in Panasonic's whitepaper, but they appear to have simplified the document. If you check out page 7 of the previous version, still available here: http://www.serv.com.ua/img/zstored/File/AVC_Intra_White_Paper_Ver_1_3.pdf you will find the following;

"The AVC-I CODEC utilizes CABAC for increased efficiency at the 50 Mb/s bit rate. At lower bit rates, hence higher compression, CABAC provides significantly better compression efficiency than would CAVLC. Indeed as a result of data from numerous test sequences, CABAC has been shown to reduce the bit rate 20～30% more than CAVLC for the 50Mbps of AVC-I compression. For less compressed, higher bit rate images, CABAC’s efficiency benefit lessens, hence at the AVC-I 100Mb/s level we chose to use CAVLC."

Guiddruid (talk) 10:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on AVC-Intra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]