Jump to content

Talk:AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications, Inc.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Outdated in 2015

[edit]

This article is outdated because of subsequent Supreme Court decisions (Bilski, Alice) that pretty much relegate it to the dust bin. They are not addressed in the article.

The article also fawns on the opinion, which is not consistent with its present low status.

Would someone like to do a comprehensive edit, pointing out that you cannot have a patent any more on a conventional implementation of the idea that the logical product of p and q is 1 if and only if both p and q = 1?

PraeceptorIP (talk) 22:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In the Impact section, the first two paragraphs are outdated and now incorrect. The third paragraph states the present situation. If nobody expresses any problem, in a few weeks I will delete the first two paragraphs and leave only the third. PraeceptorIP (talk) 00:55, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications, Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:56, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications, Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:AT%26T_Corp._v._Excel_Communications,_Inc.&oldid=1197161425"