Talk:ASPIDER
Appearance
This page was proposed for deletion by Barkeep49 (talk · contribs) in the past with the comment: Does not appear to be notable. Appears to be recreation of ASPIDER Solutions which was AfD deleted. It was contested by Kvng (talk · contribs) on 2018-05-15 with the comment: Article has been improved since PROD. Additional coverage since last deletion attempt in 2008. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Contested deletion
[edit]This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... I had to create the article in order to add the logo. I am adding content as fast as I can and have added a lot of citations to show authenticity and importance in the industry.
David
- And as I said you should have spent less time on the logo and more time on sourcing.Slatersteven (talk) 16:10, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks... I have now added sourcing references David Traynor (talk) 17:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)davidtraynor