Jump to content

Talk:ASC-15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ASC-15 for Titan III

[edit]

Looking at the speed calculation in this section:

The speed was the same as for the Titan II: 100 revolutions/second × 64 words/revolution × 27 bits/word = 172.8 kilobits/second.

...it seems to me to assume that 1) data words could be read (or written?) at the full speed of the drum; and 2) only one data track could be read/written at once. Do any of the references support this? —Eric S. Smith (talk) 15:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How a "jump" instruction worked.

[edit]

I was an electrical engineer in the AF from '69 to '72. I was educated as a computer programmer so I took an interest in how the computer worked. If I remember correctly the instructions were executed as the drum turned. When it was time to "jump" the system would wait until the heads came over the object of the "jump" then simply switched tracks accordingly and execution would pickup at the object of the "jump".

Can someone verify that I remember that correctly?

2602:306:C53F:38C0:2DD7:FE53:91A5:169A (talk) 20:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ASC-15. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]