Talk:ARPACK
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Discussion
[edit]This article may not be very good, but ARPACK is quite notable. Jeff.science (talk) 09:13, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
PARPACK
[edit]May I humbly suggest to the experts to
- mention PARPACK in this article;
- expand this article such that to provide a more detailed explanation of ARPACK - in particular, describe its purpose, its applicability, its strengths and limitations, its relation to other libraries;
- write a separate (short) article about PARPACK (and reference it in List of numerical libraries).