Talk:ARA Jujuy/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 09:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
I'll take a gander at this one. Comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 09:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Lead
- ...assigned to the fleet upon...: no context for the fleet here.
Construction and career
- reserve in 1918–1919....: I originally was going to suggest replacing 'in' with 'from' here, but have since noticed that you use the 'in' phrasing in conjunction with a date range elsewhere. Not sure if that is grammatically correct or not, couldn't find anything on it on a quick skim of the MOS
- I think that you're right; during is better grammatically
- January – May 1927,...: spacing either side of the dash shouldn't be there.
Other stuff
- Image tags look fine.
- No dupe links.
Minor nitpicks only, looks close to being ready for GA. Zawed (talk) 03:05, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hey Sturmvogel 66, a courtesy ping here. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:15, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay, all done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:26, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- OK, passing as GA now. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:10, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay, all done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:26, 30 August 2022 (UTC)