Talk:AP Physics

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Convert to disambiguation page?

I feel an entire article on "AP Physics" alone is unnecessary, and should be made into a disambiguation page instead, distinguishing AP Physics B and the variants of AP Physics C. Such is the case for AP English, which has two separate exams and is its own disambiguation page. GabeIglesia (talk) 21:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This was a disambiguation in the past, but it violates WP:DABCONCEPT, and was therefore turned into a short article. If anything, it could be an index article, but disambiguation is only for unrelated titles that share the same name. bd2412 T 22:04, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I see. I wasn't aware of the difference between disambiguation articles and index articles (I guess that was a disambiguation in itself, ironically, haha). In that case, I feel it can be simplified into an index article then, if it's possible. GabeIglesia (talk) 22:49, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the point, really. That would only entail paring the page back to the links themselves, and removing the explanations. As short a page as it already is, I don't think that would help any readers. bd2412 T 01:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Advanced Placement United States History which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:29, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Use of word "infinite"

At the end of the second paragraph, it says "It is not the usual preparation for more advanced and infinite engineering courses." Is the word infinite a typo here? — DemonicPartyHat ^talk 19:43, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that AP Physics 2 and AP Physics 1 be merged into the current AP Physics page.Asdklf; (talk) 22:33, 2 August 2014 (UTC)Asdklf;[reply]

A merger would be rather counter-intuitive, as AP Physics B was split into AP Physics 1 and AP Physics 2 due to differences in course content. I oppose the merge. S51438 (talk) 22:46, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, AP Physics encompasses four exams, not two. Merging the calculus-based Physics C exams and algebra-based Physics 1 and 2 exams may be problematic. S51438 (talk) 22:48, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All four exams are already described on this page. I think with the appropriate section organization it would work out, but I definitely believe all four exams are centrally connected as they are continuations of mastery of the AP Physics curriculum.Asdklf; (talk) 23:20, 2 August 2014 (UTC)Asdklf;[reply]

I disagree with the merger. This general "AP Physics" page gives a decent overview of the four extant and one extinct exams. The AP Physics 1 page goes more in depth on that exam. This seems a good model for readers to get the depth of information they want or need.Moishe Rosenbaum (talk) 00:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. The page as written summarizes the past and present AP Physics courses as a good introduction to the subject. Also, if the 1 and 2 courses were pulled in then we'd also have to pull in the C courses, and that's getting a lot longer and more convoluted. --Molly-in-md (talk) 12:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Molly-in-md. Why make the AP Physics article way too long? If we carry out the merge, someone will likely add Template:Very long to it, and it would get split again. Gparyani (talk) 23:34, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done
Proposal was old and response is overwhelmingly opposed; see WP:MERGECLOSE.
Removed tag from the article.
— Molly-in-md (talk) 13:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AP Physics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100601132803/http://www.collegeboard.com:80/prod_downloads/ap/students/physics/ap-cd-physics-0708.pdf to http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/ap/students/physics/ap-cd-physics-0708.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:09, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong date for C split

The AP Physics C test is listed as having split into Mechanics and E&M in 2006. I've been teaching APC continuously since 1996 (excluding 2019), and the exam had been split long before I started. I don't know the date (ironically I came here looking for it) but I suspect it was in 1974, from the very inception of APC, when the original AP Physics test was split into a B and C exam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilroy0 (talk • contribs) 08:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]