Talk:APOPO

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the APOPO article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Letter case

Where does the partial uppercasing of the word HeroRAT come under WP:MOSTM? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:04, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What does APOPO stand for?

I've seen lots of websites and articles, but nobody says what APOPO stands for. --Bluejay Young (talk) 22:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like an advertisement

Parts of this page read like an advertisement- not the kind of advertisement I would trust when deciding on a purchase. Are the rats really superior to trained dogs, humans, robots, wasps, etc. in every way? Are they completely free of any limitations (other than the inability to smell the contents of hermetically sealed containers)? --74.248.228.174 (talk) 01:18, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No criticism?

I imagine some people having issues with animals being used these ways. Is there no criticism to be referenced here? --62.143.80.6 (talk) 16:21, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I found something: http://www.miller-mccune.com/culture-society/desperately-seeking-landmines-8583/ --62.143.80.6 (talk) 16:30, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added Jim bananas (talk) 09:44, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Species clarification

"... trains African Giant Pouched Rats, also known as giant pouched rats or Gambian pouched rats (genus Cricetomys)"

The definition mixes up the genus and the species. Giant pouched rat (Cricetomys) seems to be the genus , but which species is the HeroRat? Is it a Gambian pouched rat (Cricetomys gambianus)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.127.135.168 (talk) 11:18, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article says APOPO uses the species Cricetomys ansorgei, or Southern giant pouched rat, which has its own article, but this article links to a different species, Cricetomys gambianus. I'm fixing it, since the source says, “APOPO has discovered that the species name of our rats is Cricetomys ansorgei. Kim9988 (talk) 21:32, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference for completely sealed mines

Ref 18, http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1811203,00.html, does not have any reference to sealed mines. Does anyone has a real reference? Panoramix303 (talk) 15:58, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

APOPO use of African giant pouched rats

Dear Sir or Ms, Thank you for this article and how do I donate to this organization? I will tell my friends how well it was written and thanks to the Wikipedia contributors for all the information. It is a very positive way to continue the rest of my day, thank you, Wayne N

                                        108.240.153.67 (talk) 00:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on APOPO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100103174704/http://www.apopo.org:80/history.php to http://www.apopo.org/history.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:08, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updating the page

Hey all, I want to inform the Wikipedia community that I am currently adding content to APOPO page. I have noticed that the page hasn't been not updated since 2010, and so decided to add content and information on current projects, activities and organisation structure. Please feel free to assist me or to make suggestions. Thanks Editor4Apopo (talk) 07:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reformulating limitations and critics

Hey wikipedians,

Arguments put forward in the section on limitations and critics lack of neutralité and the references come from a personal blog, reflecting the view of the author. So I decided to to reformulate the section in order to replace the critics and limitations in the context. Thks

Editor4Apopo (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:00, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on APOPO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090205024158/http://skollfoundation.org:80/grantees/a-e.asp to http://www.skollfoundation.org/grantees/a-e.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

French article has images

I just noticed that the French APOPO article has a number of nice images of the rats during training and work. (Sorry, I don't have the time to edit Wikipedia myself right now.) --David Göthberg (talk) 12:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]