Talk:AN/APG-79

Military history: Aviation / Technology / North America / United States / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

apg-65, 73 and 79 redirect

please fix the redirect from apg-65, 73 and 79 (delete it) ecause it only redirects to 65 and 73. not 79 (got itsown page) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.137.4.170 (talk) 22:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Euro-bias

All AESA radars have an "agile beam" - that's part of the technology. Btw, I checked the AMSAR and RBE2, and they don't have any sources whatsoever. Maybe certain people should worry a bit less about non-neutral "yankee doodle fans", and worry more about uncited articles on products from their own back yard. - BillCJ (talk) 03:29, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photo-cite

With regards to the citation needed tag on the side-opening radome, I've seen pictures of the radome on an F-18 opening to the side. Would it be possible to cite a picture as a source?

NobodyMinus (talk) 03:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on AN/APG-79. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070205055453/http://www.janes.com:80/defence/news/jdw/jdw070110_1_n.shtml to http://www.janes.com/defence/news/jdw/jdw070110_1_n.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AN/APG-79. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030617155706/http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/micro_stories.pl?ACCT=149999 to http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/micro_stories.pl?ACCT=149999&TICK=RTN&STORY=%2Fwww%2Fstory%2F07-01-2008%2F0004842182&EDATE=Jul%201%2C%202008

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:41, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deploying APG-79 to B-52 fleet

Discovered a new article discussing the addition of this system to B-52s. I can't make the edit myself right now, so I'll leave a link here to the source. Maybe I'll have time later. Source: [Air Force Technology article] — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 20:02, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]