Talk:AHOPE Boston

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Massachusetts

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
	Massachusetts portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Boston may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Question

@Graywalls, could you clarify something for me? Genuine question - can a source be a secondary source if it’s secondary to the subject? That was my assumption. Like if people from AHOPE are awarded something and it’s publicized somewhere that’s not AHOPE, is that not secondary? If so, can you link me to the part of Wikipedia that states this. Thanks for your help Elttaruuu (talk) 01:18, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If a Bush High coach gets a unicorn ice cream medal from the Icecreamiscle Pop Company and the cited source is the Icecreamiscle Pop Company's website, that is a source closely associated with the matter and putting that in the school's page is highly undue. Generally, an award that cites only award issuer is considered promotional. Graywalls (talk) 01:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha, thank you. Elttaruuu (talk) 01:28, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

link about: primary sources
link about: due weight, and not everything verifiable belongs

From my perspective, a statement saying an employee of this company received "Association for Multidisciplinary Education and Research in Substance Use and Addiction" award citing AMERSA itself is an undue content. You can ask questions there Wikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources or at reliable sources noticeboard. Graywalls (talk) 07:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]