Talk:AESL Airtourer
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unencyclopedic content
[edit]This article has been written without provision of any references, or citations to confirm verifiability. WP:Verifiability states the policy that the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth.
One paragraph in particular is conspicuously unencyclopedic. Without any citation, this paragraph says:
- The design proved so successful that initial Airtourer (1962-63) sales exceeded the combined sales of its giant American competitors Cessna, Beechcraft and Piper.
- Unable to match the Airtourer’s exemplary performance, the North American manufacturers then attempted to squeeze the Australian newcomer out of the market by initiating a price-cutting war
- Cessna for example, dumped massive quantities of its 1966 Model 150F on to the worldwide market at a cheaper price than its previous model.
Even though the editor must fervently have believed these things to be true, that is not sufficient for inclusion in Wikipedia. An encyclopedia gathers in one place what other documents have recorded. An encyclopedia is not a place for individuals to write what they believe to be true. See WP:No original research.
If these statements cannot be supported promptly, they must be deleted until such time as they can be re-inserted with appropriate citations. Dolphin51 (talk) 09:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Since 22 June, no attempt has been made to provide citations or other support for the unsourced and uncyclopedic comments listed above. I have deleted them. These comments can be restored in the future, providing they are adequately supported by inline citations. Dolphin51 (talk) 04:02, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
There may be no authoritative refs, but the article is mostly accurate. The only gripe I have is some missing info regarding Cessna and Piper. In 1966 when the Victa was becoming popular, both Cessna and Piper dropped the Australian prices of their small a/c by nearly 10%. It was likely to be a deliberate trade dumping. Currently exiting refs for this machine may now be no better than links enthusiast web sites. Various authoritative books on Aus aviation do exist, but at several hundred dollars per copy few readers have access to them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.236.236 (talk) 00:09, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
The above named brief article is about the same aircraft - it should be merged?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Winstonwolfe (talk • contribs) 07:44, 20 January 2011
- There is only one article. It is this one, called AESL Airtourer. The Wiki-link Airtourer is merely a re-direct to take you to AESL Airtourer. Dolphin (t) 07:24, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Re: photo of US export. AFAIK only one a/c was exported to the US. It was CN 74 (model 100) and is still registered as N4300V. It has not flown for many years.220.244.236.236 (talk) 00:15, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on AESL Airtourer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.museum-of-flight.org.au/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=53&Itemid=79/ - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080722190505/http://casa.gov.au/casadata/cota/download/34-1.pdf to http://casa.gov.au/casadata/cota/download/34-1.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080722185639/http://casa.gov.au/casadata/cota/download/34-3.pdf to http://casa.gov.au/casadata/cota/download/34-3.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/2011072022485/http://www.dave.wise.btinternet.co.uk/DWAirtourer.htm to http://www.qam.com.au/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on AESL Airtourer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060821074954/http://www.airtourer.asn.au/history.htm to http://www.airtourer.asn.au/history.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:21, 23 June 2017 (UTC)