Talk:ADInstruments
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Request
[edit]Dear Administrators / Moderators: We would like to request our page be protected due to recent spam posted on our companies page. Adinstruments (talk) 23:26, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- It's not your page - it's the Wiki's! Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! (Whisper...) 12:51, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Sounds like they are having some fun with a spammer. Have resolved reflist for em. Looks like your changed fix up more rubbish here too Brookie. Keepsmilyn (talk) 03:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Spam
[edit]This page seems to a keen one for spam peddlers - I have re-written it completely to remove puff and self promotion and irritating wikilinks! Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! (Whisper...) 10:56, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Deletion
[edit]This page seems to be subject to personal agenda. Unreferenced material previously posted was removed (by admin.), then reposted with media references. The media references have now been removed. Peer-reviewed scientific references have also been removed. Business partners form a crucial part of a business operation, yet have also been removed. Please delete this article to prevent distribution of misinformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JillBBB (talk • contribs) 05:58, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- The page read like a fanzine or promotional website and has been tidied up to make it more neutral. If there is misinformation - please correct it. Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! (Whisper...) 09:32, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- In which case the references should stand in order to meet the wiki notability guidelines. JillBBB (talk) 04:41, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
- This should be decided by someone more neutral on the subject than yourself! Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! (Whisper...) 12:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
I refer to notability guidelines. References are neutral, isn't that's why they're referenced? As you have stated, you consider me a spammer/troll, and that I'm biased, irritating and a poor writer - so it is your prerogative as a moderator to delete my account. I am not here playing games. JillBBB (talk) 04:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ADInstruments. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120320215223/http://www.jra.co.nz/news.aspx?Article=232 to http://www.jra.co.nz/news.aspx?Article=232
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://the-aps.org/MayCC/awards/society/adi.txt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)