Talk:ADC Theatre
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Note
[edit]The ADC and the ADC Theatre are separate but linked organisations. It is right that they should be separate but linked pages.
Recent Proposed Deletion by Future Fun Jumper (TIC)
[edit]Regarding a recent request by Future Fun Jumper (TIC) for speedy deletion. If that is the case, then why not propose the article about the building and the group that performs there be merged into one? There is lots of good and overlapping information there that should be kept. Is tagging an endless amount of articles as requiring 'speedy deletion' the only way Future Fun Jumper (TIC) see's to improve things? There are ways to be constructive and positive in edits without sweeping in out of nowhere and passing instant judgement. Why Future Fun Jumper (TIC) continues to behave this way on Wiki baffles me. --SpyMagician 15:30, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Discuss the article, not the user. If you want to discuss this, take it elsewhere. The vast majority of the articles I have tagged have been deleted, which means that I wasn't the only one who found them to be vanity articles about non-notable student groups or minor local groups. Unfortunately, all you are seeing is the ones that don't get deleted because the article histories get deleted when the articles do. But I agree, this needs to be merged. Finally, I still think you should not be casting the first stones after your wikistalking of me began over the article you wrote about yourself. Also, it's called Wikipedia. --Future Fun Jumper (TIC) 21:09, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- If you agree that it needs to be merged then why was your first impulse to claim speedy deletion as your first action? Also you say, "Unfortunately, all you are seeing is the ones that don't get deleted because the article histories get deleted when the articles do." that is simply not the case. Deleted articles are indeed archived; one needs to simply follow the link to the deleted pages and look at the discussion, history or reason given for the deletion. Wikipedia is open which means that things don't just disappear without a trail to explain it. It doesn't take as much effort as you claim to see someone's activity. The main contributions you seem to have been making in the past few days is a slew of 'speedy deletions' that are just as quickly denied by admins on Wiki. In fact on 22:58, 19 February 2007 (UTC) you said "I agree that the fighting isn't helping, and I really don't want to do so. I will be sure to make comments on talk pages now." So where is the drive towards discussion and positive growth? Nowhere to be seen. Especially in the case of this article where the demand for 'speedy deletion' is clearly overboard. --SpyMagician 15:30, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- You don't appear to actually know how the deletion/archiving system works. Once an article has been deleted, it no longer shows up in your contributions because the article's history is deleted when the article is. The articles are, in fact, archived, but only admins can see these and their histories. We can discuss your strange wikistalking elsewhere. --Future Fun Jumper (TIC) 02:41, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- In reference to the above notes, anyone reading this—especially those who edit comedy articles—might want to know the following and take this into consideration. Future Fun Jumper (TIC), was a 'sock puppet' of a rogue admin who took it upon themselves to slash/burn hundreds of comedy articles. For those unfamiliar with the term, a 'sock puppet' is someone who uses multiple accounts deceive others on and influence others Wikipedia. And in this case, Chris Griswold was an admin who used 'sock puppets' to taunt and bully dozens of comedy and improv related articles. —SpyMagician 06:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- You don't appear to actually know how the deletion/archiving system works. Once an article has been deleted, it no longer shows up in your contributions because the article's history is deleted when the article is. The articles are, in fact, archived, but only admins can see these and their histories. We can discuss your strange wikistalking elsewhere. --Future Fun Jumper (TIC) 02:41, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- If you agree that it needs to be merged then why was your first impulse to claim speedy deletion as your first action? Also you say, "Unfortunately, all you are seeing is the ones that don't get deleted because the article histories get deleted when the articles do." that is simply not the case. Deleted articles are indeed archived; one needs to simply follow the link to the deleted pages and look at the discussion, history or reason given for the deletion. Wikipedia is open which means that things don't just disappear without a trail to explain it. It doesn't take as much effort as you claim to see someone's activity. The main contributions you seem to have been making in the past few days is a slew of 'speedy deletions' that are just as quickly denied by admins on Wiki. In fact on 22:58, 19 February 2007 (UTC) you said "I agree that the fighting isn't helping, and I really don't want to do so. I will be sure to make comments on talk pages now." So where is the drive towards discussion and positive growth? Nowhere to be seen. Especially in the case of this article where the demand for 'speedy deletion' is clearly overboard. --SpyMagician 15:30, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ADC Theatre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110908222739/http://www.adctheatre.com/press-adc/Corpus%20Playroom%20PR/pr.pdf to http://www.adctheatre.com/press-adc/Corpus%20Playroom%20PR/pr.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:07, 1 October 2016 (UTC)