Talk:ABTS

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Backwards reasoning?

As an inorganic chemist with no specific expertise in this area, I request clarification of the first sentence of the third paragraph: "The formal reduction potentials for ABTS are high enough for it to act as an electron donor for the reduction of . . . ." An electron donor is a reducing agent, which is itself being oxidized. So the reduction half-reaction and the sign of the potential would be reversed. Should it read, "The formal reduction potentials for ABTS are low enough"? Robert Richman 14:38, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:ABTS/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

== Article cleanup == I'm having a bash at cleaning this up in my user space User:Grunkhead/ABTS. For now I'm sorting out the references, adding some specific values for formal redox potentials, and adding uses in the pulp and paper industry. Until that's done, if there are no objections, and until a revised article is back in place, I'm happy to incorporate suggested amendments in my space. Grunkhead (talk) 12:13, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 12:13, 21 October 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 06:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)