Talk:ABM-1 Galosh

Russia: Technology & engineering / Military Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cold War Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet / Cold War B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

On 10 February 2013, it was proposed that this article be moved to A-350 (missile). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Galosh as ICBM

Galosh is also the NATO code name for an ICBM system deployed by Soviet Union. Someone should add an article and a disambiguate note to this article. See National Missile Defense#The Sentinel Program. --Andrea 13:51, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Split the contradiction info to separate talks

Will copy (not moved) the appropriate talk template and comments to Galoshes and ABM-1 Galosh. LanceBarber (talk) 20:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Missile info copied and saved.LanceBarber (talk) 21:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Galosh vs Galoch

One occurrence of Galoch exists in FAS.ORG site, and internet searches finds only last names Galoch. NATO code names are U.S.-English words of objects, animals, creatures, etc. A Galosh is a overshoe (or galoshes). The other ABM missiles are Gazelle (animal) and Gorgon(mythical creature). Numerous web searches find Galosh with ABM missile.LanceBarber (talk) 08:56, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is confused. It mixes up A-35M stuff with the locations of early warning radars. Much of this belongs in A-35 anti-ballistic missile system. Secretlondon (talk) 23:10, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 23:15, 6 March 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

ABM-1 Galosh → A-350 (missile) – It is the standard procedure not to have pages on Soviet/Russian weapons at their NATO codenames, but rather at their Soviet/Russian designations. Therefore A-350 (missile) is the correct page to have this article at; I would uncontroversially move it, except later, upgraded missiles were designated "A-35M", and I'm not sure if the most-common type name or a "family" name is preferable. Relisted. BDD (talk) 17:53, 27 February 2013 (UTC) The Bushranger _{One ping only} 13:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How do you propose to handle 53T6 (NATO reporting name: ABM-3 Gazelle, previously SH-08)?? LanceBarber (talk) 01:23, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- For the moment, 53T6 with ABM-3 Gazelle and SH-08 redirecting there is just fine - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment wouldn't most Cold War systems have their English common name be the NATO reporting name? -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:26, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Not really. This is a case where having the article at the actual designation with the NATO reporting name redirecting there is the standard. Same for Japanese aircraft of WWII; D4Y Judy redirects to Yokosuka D4Y. (And I think we can all agree that Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-15 Fagot would be...unfortunate.) - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The new name is thoroughly unnatural; no source calls it "A-350 (missile)" and no reader is likely to type that string into the search box. bobrayner (talk) 19:38, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Calling it "ABM-1 Galosh" is systemic bias. Also, typing it into the search box would still find the page via a redirect. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:57, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. As the A-350 is the nuke version, the V-1000 is the conventional version. Should the V-1000 version be discussed in this article or create a separate article?LanceBarber (talk) 05:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Projected U.S. ABM suppression strike

The source given for the table 'Projected U.S. ABM suppression strike' is incorrect. The table is taken from File:Projected U.S. ABM suppression strike, 1968.png. The text in the image specifically references History of U.S. Strategic Air Command January for the claim "Based on 100+ Minuteman I/II missiles, plus Polaris missiles, designated for 1968 Soviet ABM suppression". It goes on to state "The assignment of individual weapons to individual targets is not known. We assume each launch complex was targeted by eight Minuteman missiles, each carrying one W56 warhead". (Emphasis mine) The assignment of individual weapons to individual targets is not known. In other words, all the quantitative information in this table is made up. All we can say from the supplied source is that upwards of 100 Minuteman I/II missiles plus Polaris missiles were designated for ABM suppression. The rest is not sourced. I will remove this table. - Crosbie 13:19, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ABM-1 Galosh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080905013141/http://astronautix.com/lvfam/rusdabms.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/lvfam/rusdabms.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on ABM-1 Galosh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]