Talk:ABCs of Death 2

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rewrite and Expansion

This article is poorly written end developed and is missing a majority of important information on the film. Important information missing from the article includes information on the film's production, release, reception, and home media release. More reviews from notable critics needs to be added to the article as well, and the plot section is so poorly written that it needs to be rewritten entirely. There is so many things bad with this article, such as the lack of work put into it as well as the poor writing and development of its material. All of these changes and additions need to occur in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's standards and guidelines of a well developed article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:11, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what is wrong with the plot section, it's a brief synopsis for each entry.--CyberGhostface (talk) 22:36, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Audience reaction?

Not that this was what you'd call a "popular" horror film, but can the score among the people with an account on Rotten Tomatoes really be deemed the "audience reaction?" Rotten Tomatoes may gather the reviews of every critic they can get with a claim to being a professional, but it's not like they have a deal with every audience member who ever saw the movie. That's exclusively from the people who take the time to set up an account on their website and vote on the movie in question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.111.121.164 (talk) 11:55, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]