Jump to content

Talk:ABC Fine Wine & Spirits

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

The main contributor to the article has disclosed that they are an employee of ABC Fine Wine & Spirits tasked with "increasing our web presence." Their contributions should be assumed not to be neutral, per WP:Paid editing. QuiteUnusual (talk) 13:44, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Tone issue

[edit]

The History section feels like it came from the company's website. It could do with an overhaul for tone to make sure that neutral point of view is maintained. —C.Fred (talk) 16:40, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The history section did come from the company's website, marked copyright 2015 ABC Fine Wine & Spirits. I removed all of the copyvio material. Generic1139 (talk) 19:46, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Robbery

[edit]

A sentence about a robbery has been added. While verifiable, a robbery is, unfortunately, not an uncommon occurrence in a chain of stores. Is mention of the robbery, apparently not blamed on the company or a result of its policies, store design, etc., and not unusually prevalent to this chain (at least none of these are discussed in the cited source), in a short article, placing undue emphasis on the event? Should the mention be removed? Generic1139 (talk) 17:32, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, no remove it. Shops get robbed all the time, no evidence that this robbery was especially different/important/notable. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, my convoluted syntax in the original question may have confused this. Are you saying that the mention of the robbery should be kept, or should be removed? Generic1139 (talk) 17:39, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Clarified above, remove it. Joseph2302 (talk)
Just to say, as the editor who added it, I have no opinion either way (except perhaps with a minor confession that it is pretty weak), and is one of the few occasions it is mentioned by WP:RS. Removal will rightly edge it closer to an A7, I expect. No problems. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:44, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see this article getting to A7, but I also wouldn't hold my breath for it surviving AfD. —C.Fred (talk) 01:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, a liquor story robbery is hardly encyclopedic. WP:NOTNEWS and stuff. — Brianhe (talk) 17:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Per all of the above, removed. Generic1139 (talk) 17:51, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on ABC Fine Wine & Spirits. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:ABC_Fine_Wine_%26_Spirits&oldid=1197136951"