Jump to content

Talk:A19 road

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article Style

[edit]

This article is a bit too wordy for me, which is why I've added the {{essay-entry}} template. See A1 and A66 for good examples of how a roads article should be laid out, and not simply a narrative of all its waypoints, which is not useful for an encyclopedia. See wp:mos. — superbfc [ talk | cont ] — 20:03, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This is far too long-winded and detailed. However, though I would be happy to have a go at re-writing it (at least in part), I'm a little unsure of the best way to do .I don't particularly want to change little bits at a time, nor do I want to wipe it and start again and build it up. Where would be the place to store a draft? Or is it OK to incrementally alter the style of it and have a period of time during which the page doesn't read smoothly? --SmartShark (talk) 22:42, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your input. Having discussed this with another user about another page, see my attempt at a better way of presenting route information without going into inaccessible prose: Talk:A10 road/Sandbox  — MapsMan [ talk | cont ] — 13:49, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

This isn't multimap

[edit]

Could we get more information like accidents, total traffic and general statistics? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.101.229.176 (talk) 00:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Find some sources and yes we can add them.Regan123 00:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Rather than splatter article with loads of links to external photos, would it not be better for then to be added to Wikimedia and actually put in the article to illustrate it properly, as whole things rambling text, thats been padded out to take the links. some are of little relavence any way on a quick look. Comments any one as several road article have been liberaly linked in a similar fashion ? BulldozerD11 (talk) 12:09, 5 August 2008 (UTC)-[reply]

I have removed the external links - per WP:EL. Paul W (talk) 10:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on A19 road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:11, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on A19 road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A19 road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:50, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A19 road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Major junctions

[edit]

Hello. Please note that I have reduced the amount of major junctions on this article from 21 to 20, by deleting the A172, to make it the case that only primary routes and motorways are left on the major junctions section. However, twenty roads is a lot, considering that this road is only 124 miles long. So, if you would like to/have the time to decide which roads are more important than the others, then please do :-). If not, then I will do it in the new year. Thank you. Roads4117 (talk) 10:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:A19_road&oldid=1227419279"