This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
Removed of excessive commentary and blog links - September 2010
This article was written by a sockpuppet banned for spamming links and information related to Jacob M. Appel. As I can find no independent verification in reliable sources that Appel has any kind of recognized expertise or relationship with this subject other than this "vehicle" article, I've removed his views and arguments all sourced to his blog posting on the Huffington Post and added the link to the External links section. The mainstream reporting surrounding the case should be adequate to provide the references or quotes by Appel needed for this article. Flowanda | Talk07:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ongoing Google searches still show no indication Appel has any documented, independently verified expertise in this subject, much less how his blog posts, contributed columns or comparison to any other person constitute a legitimate argument for the repeated readdition of large blocks of content devoted to his views or the assertion that his opinions quoted nowhere else other than his own blog constitutes "significant" meaning. Flowanda | Talk09:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think the major difference between Appel and others here is that appeal has written about this case and others have not. Needless to say, you seem to be on a crusade about this subject, so I imagine you will eventually carry the day, but I stand behind my observations above QuiggBy (talk) 11:08, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is a Superior Court decision, so it is only mandatory authority in a portion of New Jersey, and pursuasive authority elsewhere. This is not a decision by New Jersey's highest court, hence, it is not applicable in the "entire state of New Jersey." Racepacket (talk) 23:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
