Talk:A-Space

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the A-Space article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance).

Military history: Intelligence C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force

Confusing and Wikify

My main concern(s) now is/are that the intro section is long enough to be a good stub articel on its own and rather overwhelming. The first paragraph of it would make a good intro and the rest of the information could be another section, or follow the ToC.

Secondly, some phrases sound a little "popular press"-ish (EG. "If all this sounds incredibly expensive", "That's why the site", etc.).

Having said that, I appreciate the tone of your message and the quality of the articel's contents. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 20:47, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, see if this is better. I split up the intro and paraphrased some of the more dramatic quotes.Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 21:27, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. One last thing: I would move the page to "Intelligence Community" is uppercased as a proper name. I don't know if "US" should be spelled out or not. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 14:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion

The section on tactical user needs does not appear to have anything to do with A-Space. I read the references, which do not describe A-Space.

There is also another more recent reference from CNN that would add valuable content to the article. CNN article on A-Space.

The section, Defense Intelligence Agency initial contribution, implies that the DIA Force Protection database will be in A-Space. The reference doesn't state this.

Alter Sackbut (talk) 15:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on A-Space. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:40, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]