Talk:A-2 (Michigan county highway)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 21:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
I will review this soon. ❯❯❯ S A H A 21:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
[edit]- Add the length of highway in "Route description"
- @ArnabSaha: this was added already. What's the status of the review now? Imzadi 1979 → 18:15, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Imzadi1979:, although I didn't find any other issue, I want to go for a 2nd opinion. If no one provides opinion by tomorrow, I will pass it. ❯❯❯ S A H A 18:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- @ArnabSaha: @Imzadi1979: I took a look at this article and expressed my views below. Will211|Talk 02:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Will211, thank you... ❯❯❯ S A H A 02:57, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- @ArnabSaha: @Imzadi1979: I took a look at this article and expressed my views below. Will211|Talk 02:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Imzadi1979:, although I didn't find any other issue, I want to go for a 2nd opinion. If no one provides opinion by tomorrow, I will pass it. ❯❯❯ S A H A 18:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- @ArnabSaha: this was added already. What's the status of the review now? Imzadi 1979 → 18:15, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Comments by Will211
[edit]- In the sentence "From this intersection, the county highway runs northward through forest between Lake Michigan and the freeway in northern Berrien County", you should probably mention that the freeway being referred to is Interstate 196.
- "A-2 crosses into Van Buren County a short distance later..." how short?
Other than these concerns, the article appears to be up to GA standards. Will211|Talk 02:43, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- @ArnabSaha and Will211: two minor changes just applied. Imzadi 1979 → 04:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Imzadi1979, congrats, passed ❯❯❯ S A H A 05:50, 6 October 2020 (UTC)