Talk:9 Lies
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Hi. I have put a lot of effort in working on this page. Really need some advise. I would be gutted if it was removed now. Thanks (User talk:ninelies)
- No one wants to remove the page at this time; but it does need independent reliable sources indicating what is notable about it per notability guidelines. Your username suggests you are associated with the band that made this album; if you are, please review the conflict of interest policy and/or your talk page. On a side note, your page Nine Lies is now in the correct location; please do not restore it at "Wikipedia:Nine Lies" which is not the proper location. 331dot (talk) 20:59, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
The closest point to notability comes with the claim to recognition in a Rolling Stone review which is tagged for citation without providing the source. Other web appearances of precisely identical text to this article suggest that the whole article is little more than a press-release. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.252.132 (talk) 15:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)