Talk:98th (Prince of Wales's) Regiment of Foot
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Page to create the missing link in the history of the Staffordshire Regiment Nthep (talk) 17:04, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Possible Improvements
[edit]I have completed the B class checklist and believe that the article could be improved by addressing the following:
- in line citations: at least one per paragraph for a successful B class review;
- adding a notes (for Reflist/citations) and see also section;
- providing the full bibliographic details of the book listed in references;
- adding an image if possible;
- cleaning up the text as at the moment there are a lot of small one or two sentence paragraphs that could be combined thematically to make the article easier to read;
Just a few ideas. Hope these help. Once you have done these, you might like to seek re-assessment. To do so, please add the article's name to the list of requests at WP:MHA. Cheers. AustralianRupert (talk) 02:37, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Good work. The article is much improved now, however, I feel it just needs a couple more citations. I've added the citations needed templates to where I think they are required. Once these are added, I would be more than happy to promote it to a B class article. Well done. AustralianRupert (talk) 22:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- I have re-assessed this article now after a number of changes have been made and feel that it is now up to B class standard. There is still one citation needed, however, I feel that it should not be held back from a B for want of one citation. If this could be added, though, that would be great. Well done. AustralianRupert (talk) 13:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- where's the citation needed? NtheP (talk) 17:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's been added in now. Well done. AustralianRupert (talk) 08:59, 12 April 2009 (UTC)