Talk:97th Grey Cup

Canada: Quebec / Saskatchewan / Montreal / Sport Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Montreal (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Canadian football Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canadian football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canadian football and the Canadian Football League on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Canadian footballWikipedia:WikiProject Canadian footballTemplate:WikiProject Canadian footballCanadian football articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hamilton Tiger-Cats

by failing to win the Grey Cup this season, this ended Hamilton's record of winning every Grey Cup since their creation in the 1950's. IMHO, the article should say something about that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.218.71.208 (talk) 18:44, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean winning a Grey Cup at least once each decade since their creation? Anyway, I don't think it's within the scope of this article. PK T(alk) 19:00, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Winner

Montreal won with a field goal. 72.45.118.204 (talk) 03:03, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

13th Man

The article says "(Ironically, Duval actually missed his first attempt, but Saskatchewan was penalized for having too many men on the field.)". However, it doesn't explain why that's ironic. Should there be a mention of the significance of the 13th-man with respect to the Roughrider's marketing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.246.40.54 (talk) 19:30, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

See the WP:ITN/C entry, the only thing holding this worthy article from being on the main page is a lack of references in the 2009 CFL Playoffs section. I'm currently busy but if anyone wants to take the ball on this one, please do. Cheers,--Giants 27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 19:33, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:97th Grey Cup/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Stub by length. TFCforever (talk)

Last edited at 05:00, 24 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 06:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 97th Grey Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100211100533/http://greycup.cfl.ca/ to http://greycup.cfl.ca/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:51, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]