Talk:94 Meetings

94 Meetings has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

94 Meetings is part of the Parks and Recreation (season 2) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 8, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
January 18, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 17, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that "94 Meetings", an episode of NBC's comedy Parks and Recreation, featured the return of several actors who had previously appeared in the series, such as Alison Becker and Susan Yeagley?

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:94 Meetings/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 21:33, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have compiled the following comments:

Plot

"Leslie chains herself to the front gate to prevent construction crews from entering." - but the pic shows Tom tying her to the gate
- Fixed. — Hun ter Ka hn 21:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Andy now acts uninterested in April because he feels uncomfortable about the age difference between them" - what is the age difference?
- Fixed. — Hun ter Ka hn 21:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Ron gives her an approving smile and nod, while carving a wooden duck in his office." - I don't get this. Did I miss something above?
- Fixed. — Hun ter Ka hn 21:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Production

"The family includes April's extremely chipper mother and father Larry and Rita Ludgate (John Ellison and Terri Hoyos), and April's older sister Natalie Ludgate (Minni Jo Mazzola), who is cynical and brooding very much like April herself." Why is this important enough to be in this section.
- I thought it was worthwhile just because it's the family of one of the major characters in the show. But if you think it's not needed, by all means, drop it. — Hun ter Ka hn 21:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

"94 Meetings" received particularly high ratings among males between ages 18 and 34" - is there a reason for this?
- None that the source gives. — Hun ter Ka hn 21:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

General

I think there is something wrong with the page formatting, as the quotebox is below the References.
- I'm not seeing that error on my end. Can you be more specific? (Incidentally, I realized I forgot to add an "External links" section. That is now added.) — Hun ter Ka hn 21:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regards, Xtzou (Talk) 21:33, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! — Hun ter Ka hn 21:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Reply The pull quote is below the External links. (I use Firefox 3.6.3 on a wide screen.) There is a very large photo of a woman just above it that dwarfs the pic in the infobox. Xtzou (Talk) 22:39, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps the picture was too big and was pushing it down. I tried to reduce the size, let me know if that helped. — Hun ter Ka hn 23:24, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Somewhat. I think it is better that the pic is reduced, but the pic bleeds down into the References. Now the pull quote is opposite the External links. Do you have to have that list of guest stars? That is what's taking all the space. You could try sandwiching, putting some things on the left. In you browser it's not a problem? Xtzou (Talk) 23:40, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - No, and I have a pretty large browser myself. But I've cut some of the lesser important guests from the list to try to help. — Hun ter Ka hn 23:54, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      - Well, that's better. It at least gets the pull quote opposite the references. What browser do you use? Xtzou (Talk) 00:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        Firefox all the way, baby. :D I move the picture of Alison to the left. Hopefully that will help. — Hun ter Ka hn 00:27, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        Much better! Xtzou (Talk) 10:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: Yes

B. MoS compliance: Complies with the basic MoS
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: Sources are reliable

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail: Pass!

Another good article. Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 10:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]