Talk:92 Undina

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

No mention is made of Undina in the article ref'd at 490 Veritas. Can someone confirm Undina is a member of the Veritas family? kwami 09:36, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is not.[1] Praemonitus (talk) 01:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spectral type

According to which source it is an M-type asteroid? JPL Small-Body Database Browser notes it as an X- or Xc-type. --Harald Khan Ճ 18:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Xc is from the Bus taxonomy. Praemonitus (talk) 01:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 92 Undina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5mqof7ROl?url=http://www.psi.edu/pds/resource/albedo.html to http://www.psi.edu/pds/resource/albedo.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:30, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in 92 Undina

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 92 Undina's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Ferret":

From 1086 Nata: "Asteroid 1086 Nata – Nesvorny HCM Asteroid Families V3.0". Small Bodies Data Ferret. Retrieved 26 October 2019.
From List of minor planets: "Small Bodies Data Ferret". Nesvorny HCM Asteroid Families V3.0. Retrieved 21 February 2019.
From 2934 Aristophanes: "Asteroid 2934 Aristophanes – Nesvorny HCM Asteroid Families V3.0". Small Bodies Data Ferret. Retrieved 26 October 2019.
From Asteroid family: "Small Bodies Data Ferret". Nesvorny HCM Asteroid Families V3.0. Archived from the original on 2 August 2017. Retrieved 22 July 2017.
From 490 Veritas: "Asteroid 490 Veritas – Nesvorny HCM Asteroid Families V3.0". Small Bodies Data Ferret. Retrieved 24 October 2019.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, both the "Ferret" and "Nesvorny-2014" references are not defined and so the new addition to this page remains unreferenced. I've rolled it back so that the article is properly referenced. Once the correct references can be found and added to this article, we'll have new material that's properly referenced. -- Mikeblas (talk) 19:54, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]