Talk:91st Bombardment Group

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[RAF Alconbury#482d Bombardment Group (Pathfinder)|"Pathfinder" group]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

Skimming through this article, everything looks really awesome and should probably be nominated for Good Article status. Just some possibly helpful suggestions to make this thing better:

~~For the Organization of the 91st Bomb Group (H) section, I'd suggest using tables to clean up the section and to make it easier for the reader to see the information.~~ Done.
~~Some inline referencing on numbers and statistics~~ Done.
~~Move B-17F picture to below infobox.~~ Done.

Hope this is helpful somehow! --Laserbeamcrossfire 23:30, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very. Thanx.--Buckboard 07:48, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

In the casualties section it says 7 infantry divisions had a higher KIA rate than this group and then scrolling over the citation lists them but it lists the 29th twice. 2601:98A:4000:69CB:3075:64BF:C466:1338 (talk) 17:31, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]