Jump to content

Talk:901 New York Avenue/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) 13:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Points
  • I'm seeing quite a lot of offline references. If possible, could these be linked to online?
  • In the "Architecture and design" section, reference 29 needs fixing. Please remove the "]" after "April 1, 2005.]".

Thanks! ⇒TAP 17:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

both done. I managed to find the articles that I could♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:16, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More
  • "was cited by Esquire magazine" — add the prefix "the " before Esquire.

⇒TAP 17:39, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you mean, cited by Esquire magazine is correct I think "the Esquire magazine" would be incorrect,♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:16, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is the being reviewed against WP:WIAGA or against personal preferences? The requirement for less offline references is certainly not a requirement of GA. Pyrotec (talk) 21:40, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • The references with the URLs allows the reader to look at the references. It may not be required, but is nicer where applicable. This is in addition to the criteria. ⇒TAP 21:48, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the articles can be accessed online, then its a good idea to link them, but as Pyrotec says, not compulsory. Vast majority of sources for Vlastimil Koubek are not found online.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:901_New_York_Avenue/GA1&oldid=498899094"