This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Article Evaluation - 8th United States Colored Infantry
The sections of this article do not tie into each other well, which makes it a bit distracting to read. The information is up to date as far as I know, but it is relatively short and could contain more detail on the subject. It could be written more eloquently, and the flow could be improved. Overall, this article was short, not easy to understand, not well written, and choppy. This article could definitely use some more detail, organization, and a better focus on the topic.
The article appears to be neutral and doesn't contain any strong opinion. No viewpoints are expressed; just vague facts.
The citations and links are well done. They are relevant to the article and contribute to its main point. The citations can help readers understand more fully if they are utilized. The links and citations are reliable for the most part, as they are all for other Wikipedia articles which are supposed to be neutral and contain accurate information.
There aren't any conversations going on behind the scenes, and no comments currently.
This article is not well rated and is not part of any WikiProjects.
Compared to discussions about different topics in class, this article is vague and doesn't contain much useful information or detail. We go into much more depth about our particular subjects in class.
Why did this infantry form and how were they treated by their commanders and other union soldiers?Ajefferies (talk) 07:42, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
