Talk:8K resolution

Camera Examples

Karaatanasov (talk) 16:03, 7 January 2019 (UTC) The list of 8K cameras is incomplete and as comments below suggest may be wrong. For example here is a missing Sony camera https://pro.sony/en_MY/press/1237495212139[reply]

The Sony F65 CineAlta filmcamera can 8k (RAW Recording), the camera was introduced since 2011!

The RED isn't a good example cause it still can't record 8k! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.223.144.119 (talk) 01:06, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Resolution

Why is this article talking about 8k as a resolution? The Wikipedia article about resolution clearly states that you're talking about pixel dimensions. Resolution is something totally different.

To the unsigned comment: when you walk into Best Buy and ask to see the TVs with 4K resolution, they know exactly what you are talking about. Perhaps you are being too restrictive in your definition of resolution?

Cameras and displays can be viewed as color/light measurement equipment and corresponding measurement readout. "Resolution" is a completely valid term to apply to these devices. Resolution of a display refers to the maximum possible ability to resolve minor differences in the measurement being represented. GlenwingKyros (talk) 16:50, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IMAX

Is the IMAX dual 4K laser projection system 8K? Is it projecting alternating lines of 4K image that combine to give 8K, or is each projector projecting alternate frames? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 22:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that is alternate frames or something that at the end of the day doubles brightness, frame rate, 3D brightness, etc, I am quite very certain it is not doing an effect similar to pixel shifting to get 8K, and if it was, it would be only horizontally. And with this being the best of the best, cinema is trying to catch up but is still just as far behind as ever since the dawn of digital with the amount of time elapsed to get this rolled out. B137 (talk) 18:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Human Eye FPS

>The human eye also sees at around 200 - 250 frames per second/hertz

it should be around 20-25 fps with some humans being able to see flickering up to 60 hz. What is the source for the mentioned 200-250 fps?

Designing with the mind in mind (ISBN-13: 978-0124079144) claims that an average human can only process sight every 10 ms, which is 100 FPS. In comparison with video specs, this would seem to be the basis behind the creation of PAL (50 FPS). NTSC on the other hand seems to target the maximum some humans can see by aiming for half of 120 FPS. I could not find any reliable sources mentioning anything remotely like 200-250 FPS. This needs a reliable source. 79.180.37.206 (talk) 22:30, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

>As of 2017, most cameras only take 720p at 240fps with 240hz monitors being limited to 1080p

this makes no sense and does not reflect reality.

720p is 60fps, 1080p is 30/60fps and 4k is 30fps on most consumer cameras/monitors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.157.177.230 (talk) 10:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

4k Smart TV with 8K HDMi monitor function is not really 8K Tv

I am curious for this part of article:

It is predicted (2018 forecast by Strategy Analytics) that 8K-ready devices will still only account for 3% of UHD TVs by 2023 with global sales of 11 million units a year.

Because I do not think that small sales of 8K TV is anything surprising.

As those 8K TV sets are not 8K Smart TV, but Merely 4k Smart Tv with 8K HDMi monitor function.

They had trouble even with playback of 8K files from Pendrive. Main Trouble free content: 8K Photos.

There was no 8K Blu Ray published.

So it is not mystery, that such lack of functionality does not cause leading rolle as game changer in buyers decision,

I recall that in late 2020 were first real Smart 8K TV, that could even 8K content from streaming (YT - top level in global popularity VOD service) for first time in history.

(Late 2020 - like late November 2020) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.187.202.138 (talk) 16:47, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Math

no any thing 47.15.3.113 (talk) 01:09, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]