Talk:86th Street station (IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line)/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 13:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Comments
- Is the " 86 Street" in the infobox on purpose, i.e. not "86th" but "86"?
- Yes, there was a discussion a while ago to change these across NYC subway system articles. I had initially advocated against it, but it was changed anyway. Epicgenius (talk) 17:14, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- "Division A (IRT)" is mentioned in the infobox but this doesn't appear in the article?
- This is something else that's strange. Under New York City Subway nomenclature, the A division covers ex-IRT lines and the B division covers ex-Brooklyn Manhattan Transit and Independent Subway System lines. Honestly, I had considered it to be an intrinsic quality until you brought it up. I'll see what I can do. Epicgenius (talk) 17:14, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- "legal challenges" what were the nature of these?
- "[6]:186[3]" order.
- "the initial system" do you mean the first 28 stations? I'm not sure what "initial system" is here.
- Doing... I am fixing these across some other articles. Epicgenius (talk) 17:14, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed Epicgenius (talk) 18:37, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- "$13,719,643" too accurate!
- Be consistent and inflate all figures, to the same degree of accuracy.
- Done
- "new entrance did not have an entrance kiosk." repetitive.
- You have NYCTA abbreviated but not used in the prose.
- "the 3 train at all times" overlinked.
- "terra-cotta" hyphenated?
- You have two captions mentioning cartouches but no mention of cartouches in the prose.
- What's FDNY?
- "kids at play" ->"children at play"?
- Done
- Ref 32 and one ext link: spaced hyphen should be en-dash.
- Refs 38, 39 no SHOUTING please.
- 10 external links seems a little excessive, surely if there's really good and important stuff in there which aren't pictures, it could be included in the article?
- Removed some. External link bloat is a big problem in NYCS station articles. I removed a bad link and 2 artwork links which are used in the article. Epicgenius (talk) 17:14, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
That's all I have, on hold for now. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 15:23, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: Thanks for the comments, and as always, good points. I've fixed some and am now fixing the rest, as the other issues are also spread across other articles. Epicgenius (talk) 17:14, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: I've fixed all of these now. These were all fairly minor issues. Epicgenius (talk) 18:37, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, all good here so promoting. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 07:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: I've fixed all of these now. These were all fairly minor issues. Epicgenius (talk) 18:37, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.