Talk:816 Squadron RAN

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / South Pacific / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Australia: Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal 816 Squadron RAN is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Terminology

When I expanded the article I used the term "816" on its own in a number of places without the word "Squadron". This was deliberate since within the Navy this is common usage. I served on 816 and 851 Squadrons during the 1970s and 80s and we very rarely added the word "squadron".

BTW, I have seen a tendancy on a few places to call Naval squadrons using the form "No 816 Squadron" (for example), this is an Air Force use, where it is common to call the squadrons "No <whatever> Squadron". This is never done in the Navy.

In vs on. The correct term is to serve or embark in a ship. You serve on a squadron. Nick Thorne 22:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nick. I added the 'squadrons' for consistancy with other articles on flying squadrons, and I'd suggest that these be retained. Using references to 'squadron' also looks more formal, which is probably a good thing in an encyclopedia. I wasn't aware that the correct terminology was for squadrons being 'in' ships and people serving 'on' the squadrons, so I would suggest that you fix my mistakes here as appropriate. --Nick Dowling 10:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:816sqn crest.gif

Image:816sqn crest.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have added what I believe to be the appropriate fair use rationale for a military unit crest. Also, I have deleted the image from the Royal Navy article 816 Naval Air Squadron since the crest in question is the RAN one.Nick Thorne ^talk 06:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 816 Squadron RAN. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130308051648/http://www.minister.defence.gov.au/2012/12/13/minister-for-defence-and-minister-for-defence-materiel-joint-media-release-capability-update-%E2%80%93-air-projects/ to http://www.minister.defence.gov.au/2012/12/13/minister-for-defence-and-minister-for-defence-materiel-joint-media-release-capability-update-%E2%80%93-air-projects/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]