Jump to content

Talk:77th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 18:07, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:07, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, look forward to your feedback.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 15:10, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • External links OK, no DABs.
  • Shrink the images, they rather dominate the article.
Shrunk'ed!EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Images appropriately licensed.
  • The 77th Infantry Division of the British Army was formed on 1 December 1941, during the Second World War, from the re-organisation of the Devon and Cornwall County Division. Suggest rephrasing this: "The 77th Infantry Division of the British Army was formed during the Second World War by the re-organisation of the Devon and Cornwall County Division on 1 December 1941."
Amended.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • infantry brigades that were then loaned Loaned? I think that assigned is a better term for a situation that endured over a year.
It was the term the source used, but I have amended per your suggestion.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's notional role was typo
Amended.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Any particular reason why they disbanded the 77th and reformed it into the 45th rather than just leaving it alone and the 45th disbanded?
Yes, and added.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't use the semi-colon to set off your footnotes and citations sections as they screw with screen readers. Use instead the appropriate number of equals signs for headers instead.
Amended.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Amended.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your review. RegardsEnigmaMcmxc (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]