Talk:6RPH

Australia: Western Australia / Perth Low‑importance

	Australia portal 6RPH is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Perth (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Radio Stations Low‑importance

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

6RPH is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Requested Move

Disagree Whilst I can understand the reasoning behind the request to rename the article (in order to standardise all radio stations to using the official ACMA callsign) however the station identifier (used in the press) is what people are aware of not the ACMA callsign. This identifier is used throughout wikipedia in a varierty of articles - in order to minimise confusion that will no doubtly arise through renaming the article I would suggest that there be a redirect from Information Radio to 6RPH at the very least. Dan arndt (talk) 06:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here, WP:NC#Broadcasting seems to be a more specific naming convention that should take precedence over WP:UCN, and we have performed many similar moves of late. Perhaps there should be a specific discussion as relates to Australian radio stations, but for the time being, I have standardized the title of the article. The redirect will remain in place. Dekimasu よ! 05:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you do initiate a wider discussion, please let me know. If you're particularly unhappy with my decision, please let me know, and I will revert the change. Dekimasu よ! 05:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.cbonline.org.au/%5Cmedia%5CElection_07%5CRPH_Summary1.1.pdf
- In 1RPH on 2011-06-09 12:22:29, 401 Access Denied
- In 4RPH on 2011-06-19 14:09:28, 401 Access Denied
- In 6RPH on 2011-06-19 20:47:54, 401 Access Denied

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:48, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 6RPH. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725125308/http://www.cbonline.org.au/media/Election_07/RPH_Summary1.1.pdf to http://www.cbonline.org.au/%5Cmedia%5CElection_07%5CRPH_Summary1.1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]