Talk:61st Infantry Division (United Kingdom)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 16:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start this one shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One DAB to be fixed.
External links OK
Clarify Carton de Wiart's exact role in Norway better

I believe I have clarified this now.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's better, but I also made a change regarding the source for his staff. See if it suits you.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the division would be followed by the Followed by the Fix this

AddressedEnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

5th and 48th (South Midland) divisions and the 71st and 72nd Independent Infantry brigades Capitalize divisions and brigades as they're proper nouns.

AddressedEnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shorten the link for Fullbrook-Leggat to just his first and last names. In general, the naming conventions for people have change with middle names no longer being used. Instead give just first and last names, with occupation, like British Army general, in parentheses as a disambiguator.

DoneEnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

men the Royal Artillery missing "from"

FixedEnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the Orkney and Shetland missing Islands?

AddedEnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

and it's personal trained two typos

Fixed 'personnel', what is the other ... I am just not seeing it right now (long day!)EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The apostrophe in it's. That's used only for the contraction of it is, contrary to the usage with every other word.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and I have amended that.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hyphenate front line

FixedEnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Be consistent in using title case in your references.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:47, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think I got them all (apart from the "the"s etc.)EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks once more for another review Sturmvogel. I left a comment above, since I just dont see that typo at the moment! Any other comments welcome, and I will get right on them for you ... well tomorrow!EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]