Jump to content

Talk:575 (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article575 (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 20, 2016Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:575 (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 01:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Infobox

[edit]
  • If this article is written in British English, which it seems to be, you must list the date as 14 July 2010 instead of July 14, 2010

Lead

[edit]
  • The lead looks fantastic!

Background and composition

[edit]

Paragraph 1

[edit]
  • You used "alongside" back-to-back twice, so I would try to think of a better word choice
  • What does it mean to have "partial rights" through a music corporation? Could you rephrase this as well please

Paragraph 2

[edit]
  • Add "a" before "majority of the song, the girl's vocals..."
  • What is a/who is "Asian Junkie"? Couldn't you just say "Japanese editor Random J reviewed the album..."?

Critical response

[edit]
  • Since you used "favourable" here, you either need to change the date in the infobox to what I suggested earlier or change to "favorable" please
  • Again: "What is a/who is "Asian Junkie"? Couldn't you just say "Japanese editor Random J reviewed the album..."?"
  • There is a link to the article "Macaroni" that you are missing; please link and include this
  • Change to "gave the song a mixed review; despite his appreciate of the slow..." please
  • Change to "second half of the album and felt these factors..." please

Commercial performance

[edit]
  • Ruled by who?
  • Change to "It peaked at number 73 on Billboard's Japan Hot 100 chart and is the highest charting non-single track from JPN." please
  • Change to "It then charted on the now defunct RIAJ Digital Track Chart, peaking at number four and was the group's highest charting single on there." please; the discontinuation of the chart at the end is not necessary and should be moved towards the beginning of the statement/sentence
  • Ownership of "sales": "the song's overall sales to 200,000 units.[13][14]"

Promotion and live performances

[edit]
  • Could you add a topic sentence to introduce this section?
  • Remove "had" before "performed a cover version of the song..." please
  • Change to "The performance included the girls dancing around geometrical shapes and was positively received from music critics. Yuki Sugioka from Hot Express complimented the girls performance, alongside the stage production of the segment." please
  • If there's a music video available for this track, shouldn't it be included further in this article?
  • Ownership of "groups": "the group's 180 Gram vinyl compilation box set..."
  • Is the mention of "180 Gram vinyl" necessary? I think it would work just as well with "the group's compilation box set..." What do you think?

Track listing

[edit]
  • Since "575" was only released as a song/track, and not a single or promotional single, this section is not necessary and should be removed

Credits and personnel

[edit]
  • Instead of mentioning "the parent album", please actually state the album's title instead

Release history

[edit]
  • The "Japan" region could be condensed using a "rowspan" template
  • The "Tokuma Japan Communications Universal Music Japan" could be condensed using a "rowspan" template as well

End of GA Review:

[edit]

A rather short, but expertly written article. However, this article includes no pictures–I would suggest adding a picture somewhere (one would do well in the "Promotion and live performances" section of the article). Let me know what you decide to do while the article is placed on hold for seven days to allow for changes. Thank you! Carbrera (talk) 02:05, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Carbrera: Done and dusted! CaliforniaDreamsFan (talk · contribs} 04:59, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have passed the article, great work! I love seeing your passion come alive in these articles! Carbrera (talk) 00:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 575 (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:42, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]