Talk:530 (song)

530 (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 2, 2024	Good article nominee	Listed

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

GA Review

Passed. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 17:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:530 (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Kyle Peake (talk · contribs) 20:33, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: BennyOnTheLoose (talk · contribs) 12:56, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Copyvio check: I reviewed the top few matches found using Earwig's copyvio Detector (largest of which was 7.4%). No issues, just attributed quotes, phrases acceptable per WP:LIMITED etc. Only one minor issue found during spot checks, mentioned below.

Image is CC (as confirmed by YouTubeReviewBot).

Sources seem appropriate; none that I am concerned about.
I don't think that the "Vultures 2" in Kearse, Stephen (August 14, 2024). "Vultures 2". Pitchfork. should have the italic formatting applied.

Not done since album titles are obviously italicized, I think this is appropriate when there are no characters surrounding the title. --K. Peake 17:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Ty Dolla Sign" being linked in Composition and lyrics is perhaps an overlink, but would not prevent GA status.

Done --K. Peake 17:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spot check on "On February 10, 2024, Kanye West and Ty Dolla Sign released Vultures 1, their debut album as ¥$ and the first in their Vultures series" - no issues.
"Vultures 2" could be wikilinked at the first instance in the article body.

Done --K. Peake 17:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spot check on "Distortion was added to some of the vocals and sound effects were altered, mostly ones of drinks pouring" - no issues.
Spot check on "Musically, "530" is a R&B number" - no issues.
Spot check on "The song was noted as sounding unfinished by multiple publications" - no issues.
Spot check on "West portrays himself as a drunk man delivering a voicemail" - no issues.
Spot check on "reflecting on his alcohol dependence damaging the two's relationship in his first verse" - no issues.
"the fifth best" - maybe add the total number of tracks, to give this context?
Spot check on "called it a ripoff of Drake's "Marvins Room" - probably best to put "ripoff" as a quote, as the word appears in the source.

Done --K. Peake 17:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spot check on " Paul Attard wrote off the song for having a "demo quality" and sounding like a rip from a YouTube leak." - no issues.
Charts - did it not chart anywhere else, or did you specifically only include the US-based charts?

The song did not chart anywhere outside of the US from my research, unless I have just not found any further charts where it had entered. --K. Peake 17:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox had length of "4:49" but this is not cited in the body.

Done --K. Peake 17:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead: " the song features West lamenting Kim Kardashian's parenting skills" - do you think it's worth expanding slightly on their relationship here? I suppose that not everyone knows about it.

Done --K. Peake 17:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not much I can say about this one, Kyle Peake. Great work again. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BennyOnTheLoose Thanks for the review once again, that was very fast and I've covered everything now of course!! --K. Peake 17:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyle Peake: I'm satisfied that the article meets the GA criteria, so I'm passing it. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 17:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.