Talk:50 Lions
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deletion
[edit]Whoever requested this to be deleted, why did you do that? I've seen much worse band pages that don't have any sources and not much info, such as Carpathian. But anyway I added more information and put in sources to make you happy. Welshy (talk)
- As I am not from Australia, I have no idea what constitutes a legit band. That's why a few sources are so helpful. Blast Ulna (talk) 07:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:50 Lions/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
start: some info & infobox supplied; needs more: in-line refs, details, sectns and remove trivia sectn (put relevent info elsewhere or delete it) to get to C-class;Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 04:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 06:09, 29 April 2016 (UTC)