Talk:500 euro note/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vibhijain (talk · contribs) 15:49, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will review it in coming weeks. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 15:49, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am declaring my assistance to the nominator in improving this artcle; I will keep a close eye on the page and the GA Nomination. P.S.: Hi Vibhijain!!! – Plarem ^{(User talk contribs)} 18:57, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Me too also I will try to do it. --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 14:28, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
	1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	~~Section 5 needs a copy-edit.~~ Done ~~Need some work removing copyright violations. ([1])~~ Done ~~Why is there space between punctuation marks and references?~~ Done ~~Why is "As of August 2011" in brackets? (in section 4)~~ Done
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	~~References 15-21 should be in one, as in 100 euro note.~~ Done ~~Photos are needed for improvement. ??? Please say in what way...~~ They are NOT needed for improvement, Katarighe...
	2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Article has many misplace citations, for example, re.1 o not support the statement "the five hundred euro note shows modern architecture (between the 20th and 21st century)". Please fix all such cases. Done
	2c. it contains no original research.
	3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
	6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	~~File:Nota 500 euros.jpg not correctly marked for copyright~~ Done
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	~~No alt for File:Nota 500 euros.jpg~~ Alt is not needed for GA Article Pictures. See WT:WIAGA#Picture question.
	7. Overall assessment.	Congrats! Article passed.