Jump to content

Talk:500 Park Avenue/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basic stuff and comments

[edit]
  • "similarly to the" → "similar to the"
  • "reaches to the curb" → "reaches the curb"
  • Remove the comma after "from the 1980s".
  • "nearly-full-height" → "nearly full-height"
  • "different stories of building" → "different stories of the building"
  • Remove the hyphen between "anodized-aluminum".
  • "guiderails" should be two words.
  • "soffit which extends" → "soffit that extends"
  • "empty space" sounds weird. Both words basically mean the same thing.
  • "partitioned hall was" → "partitioned hall were"
  • "similar to in the" - reword.
  • Remove the comma after "Great Depression".
  • Remove the comma after "move to the Pepsi-Cola Building".
  • "had a large amount of" → "had a number amount of"
  • "through third floors" - reword.
  • Wikilink articles for reporters from The New York Times.

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
Thanks. I've done all of these. Epicgenius (talk) 22:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.