Jump to content

Talk:4 by the Beatles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:34, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Change to article title

[edit]

I've changed the title of this article from 4-by the Beatles to 4 by the Beatles. This is based on how the title appears in several books: Castleman & Podrazik's All Together Now (1976), Nicholas Schaffner's The Beatles Forever (1978), Barry Miles' The Beatles Diary (2001) and Walter Everett's The Beatles as Musicians: The Quarry Men through Rubber Soul (2001). According to the Bruce Spizer book sourced in the article, Capitol's initiative was called the "4-By" series, but I don't really see that as a reason not to go with the others as far as this particular title goes. Also worth noting that the release was listed on the Billboard Hot 100 on 27 March 1965 (p. 32 in the preview) as Four by the Beatles – inconsistent spelling-out of "four", but again, no hyphen. JG66 (talk) 14:55, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 4 by the Beatles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]