Talk:3rd millennium BC

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 3rd millennium BC article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wow. Is this confused.

I came to this article to simply determine what is meant by the title term. Specifically, does it refer to the time span of 4,000 to 3,000 B.C.E. or to 3,000 to 2,000? Since dates between 4000 and 2000 are in profusion in the bulk of this mish-mash, I had to go to the end to see that at least one editor considers the 3rd Millinnium to consist of the 21st thru 30th Centuries B.C. Major failure to actually have a useful lede.
Oh, if anybody is so inclined, the sentence:"The 3rd millennium BC spans the Early to Middle Bronze Age." is wrong. The Bronze Age spans the dates 3600-600 B.C. and in point of fact its a term for the dates that a particular civilization uses a particular set of technologies. That is: there IS no single Bronze Age, it is a term which must be relative to a particular civilization (location).
Further:"It represents a period of time in which imperialism, or the desire to conquer, grew to prominence, in the city-states of the Middle East, but also throughout Eurasia." Should, imho, be deleted or possibly changed to:"It [what? the 3rd Millennium or the Bronze Age?] represents a period of time in which imperialism grew to prominence in the city-states of the Middle East, and also throughout Eurasia." The clause about the desire to conquer is rubbish, people haven't changed - the desire to control others isn't something that "rises to prominence", it is something which (due to economic, technical, or social factors) is ACTED on. I have also cleaned up the excessive use of commas and other errors in grammar.
Finally, I note that this article is EXTREMELY Eurasian-centric. (As well as focusing almost exclusively on civilizations rather than climate and ecologies).173.189.79.42 (talk) 16:07, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm..

Didn't mahabharata believed to have happened in 30k bce or the Mahabharata is fictional? Or it doesn't go with the idea of harrapan civilization 950CMR (talk) 15:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If bilgamesh can be in this why not Kurkhestra war? 950CMR (talk) 16:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Technically Kurkhestra does exists if Kurkhestra isn't that Kurkhestra that is mentioned in the Mahabharata then it was named Kurkhestra to create conspiracy now i'm not being biased here but this airtcle should have had mahabharata or atleast mahabharata epoach date if y'all don't think mahabharata happened at all and it was just a fake scientific story 950CMR (talk) 16:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]